The Terminator Page

Answers and analyses: establishing things

I recommend reading this page in order.

Is this even possible?
"There's no fate but what we make for ourselves" – add that to the concept of there being multiple futures, pasts, and timelines generally, each impacted by certain choices and actions, and, well... the answer will be your own. Fundamental truths might be stable across time as their terms imply: souls and soulmates, fated encounters, core ideas and messages, and so on. Other certain foundational or material things or occurrences remain the same or carry over across timelines, like, of course, the laws of physics and chemistry and such; those cannot and will not change. It's a forevermore hot topic in physics for a reason.

Is the franchise real?
Again... you decide. I've seen theories that James Cameron is a time traveler. Assuredly some part of it is real – the dangers of AI, especially in conjunction with war, began to rise highly in the 1990s, and more significantly in the 2020s. The threat of nuclear battle and even annihilation are still prevalent. Perhaps it's delayed. Perhaps altered or avoided. The choice is yours.
I'm Catholic, and it reflects Catholicism quite well, so I'm further inclined... but I'm just a huge fan. Nevertheless, I've done my research and thinking. There's definitely a level of realism to it. Read on if you want to increase it...

I want to believe!
As aforementioned, some hold James Cameron to be a time traveler. Stranger things have happened, right? Maybe it's the true story of another timeline, or a would-be situation, and we really were spared in the mid-late 1990s. (The second film is a 1991 story of a 1995 series of events.) Even if you don't hold that, you might hold onto other things. Anyway... we can dream. Do you want to?

In theory, any book or story not too outlandish or obviously improbable could be real. Many fictional movies seem probable enough. The whole premise of fiction is to make the everyday extraordinary and to make anything happen in any old life. Ask yourself, why does this one, then, seem more real? Why do you want to believe it so badly?

Are you saying the film's portrayals of people, places, and events are real, then? But what about errors?
"Are you saying it's from the future?" "One possible future..."
It's this timeline's portrayal of the truth of another timeline, conveyed in an easy-to-disgest format as a film; thus, there will be goofs, shifts, plot holes, and so on – human error and limitation, and things do change across timelines except for fundamental truths – for example, of course the T-1000 looks a little strange made with older graphical technology; it's the only way that that could be portrayed at the time. How would the actual T-1000 ever be replicated? So think of it is a message, a warning, made in a way we can understand.

Archives and alleged anemoia

Future soldiers' files

Soldier skills

On the intersection of time, technology, and culture

Go back?